, 5th Ed. By
Axelrod and Cooper. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997
Who Are We? Readings on Identity, Community, Work, and Career, Axelrod
and Cooper. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997
A Writer’s Reference, 4th Ed. By Diana Hacker.
Boston: Bedford Books, 1999
Other Materials
öOne
blank 3.5 inch floppy disk
ö
One notebook with loose leaf paper
for class notes/Response Journal
öOne
folder for writing assignments
ö
Hardback American Heritage or
Webster’s Collegiate dictionary
Course Description and Objectives
This class is an introduction to composition, designed to help you become a
competent writer. Writing affects the way we think and
learn, as
well as for our
chances of success, our personal development, and our relations with other
people. Since most academic writing is based on reading, it is important to
learn to read critically, understanding the connections between reading and
writing. The emphasis in this class is on learning by doing, so expect to read
and write often. We will have five short essays, eight in-class essays, one oral
presentation for each student, and a response journal, all of which, are
organized around specific rhetorical modes. To make your revision easier, I
strongly recommend that you type all your papers on a computer or word
processor. Always keep backup copies on all writing assignments.
As a student of English Composition 101, you will
1. analyze the rhetorical situation by making strategic choices as to
content, style, and form depending on the purpose, audience, and the genre
in which you write.
2. use writing as a tool to improve your critical thinking skills.
3. use writing to improve your creative imagination skills.
4. learn how to gather writing knowledge from a community of writers.
5. understand and effectively practice the writing process(prewriting,
writing, self editing, peer editing, and revision).
6. understand that revising involves substantial rethinking and
rewriting, and to learn to make such revisions of one's own writing.
7. learn to edit one's own writing for global organization, style, and
sentence level accuracy.
8. learn to read critically and respond constructively to published and
peer texts.
9. learn how to position one's argument in relation to one's sources.
10. learn how to incorporate and cite external sources in one's writing.
11. learn to write clearly and effectively in impromptu situations.
12. learn to generate rhetorically effective sentences.
Requirements
Writing Assignments: Each essay has a minimum of four stages and all
stages must be included when the final draft is turned in. If you do the
optional fifth stage of writing, be sure to turn in all previous work associated
with that "re-revised" essay. A brief description of the invention,
planning and drafting, middle draft peer review, final draft, and revised final
draft stages will be explained.
1. In-class invention writing workshop: Each student will be expected to
participate. It is at this stage that you find a topic, discover what you
know about it, consider your purpose, and audience, and further develop your
ideas about the selected topic.
2. In-class planning and drafting: Once the initial period of invention
is completed, you should review what you have learned about the topic and
start to plan your essay. The "Guides to Writing" in the book will
help you to set goals and to organize your ideas and information in order to
achieve those goals. Planning requires you to put your ideas into a
coherent, purposeful order appropriate to your readers; drafting challenges
you to find the words that will be understandable and interesting for those
readers. Invention continues as you draft, for you will continue to make
further discoveries about your topic as you work. But drafting requires you
to shift your focus from generating new ideas and gathering further
information to forging new and meaningful relations among your ideas and
information.
3. In-class middle draft peer review: After you have finished drafting
your essay, you will show it to someone else for comments and advice on how
to improve it. Most experienced writers often seek advice from others. Each
student on this day of class shall evaluate a minimum of three essays from
other students in the class. To evaluate someone else’s draft, you need to
read with a critical eye by using the critical comments section in the book
for each assigned essay. Be both positive and skeptical-positive in that you
are trying to identify what is workable and promising in the draft,
skeptical in that you need to question the writer’s assumptions and
decisions. Offer advice, but do not rewrite the paper. Your role is to read
carefully, to point out what you think is or is not working, to make
suggestions and ask questions. Leave the revising to the writer. Do not edit
the paper for grammatical correctness.
4. Final Draft: Even productive invention and smooth drafting rarely
result in the essay a writer has imagined. Experienced writers are not
surprised or disappointed when this happens, however. They expect to revise
a draft and revising will help move them closer to the essay they really
want to write. Read your middle draft critically and thoughtfully. Reflect
on the critical reading by others and see if you can find opportunities for
improvement. You may notice misspelled words or garbled sentences; most
important, however, you may discover ways to delete, move, rephrase, and add
material in order to express your ideas more clearly. It is at this point
that the instructor gets an opportunity to evaluate your writing in its
first four stages: namely the invention, planning and drafting, middle draft
peer review, and final draft stages.
5. Revised final draft (optional): I will write comments and suggestions
on your final draft and you may choose to keep the grade I give you or you
may revise and resubmit it for reassessment. If you choose to revise, you
will have one week from the time that I hand back the graded final draft
essay.
Here are the papers that you will be expected to write this quarter:
*Narration: Remembering an Event
*Explaining Concepts
*Taking a Position
*Making Evaluations
*Interpreting Stories
I will only accept papers that are double-spaced, typed and at least 3-4
pages in length. Please only put your name on the back of the last page of your
essay.
Class presentations: Each student shall give a short (5 minutes
depending on topic) oral presentation on the topic of my choice. You will be
expected to contribute meaningful information about different writing strategies
and how these strategies can be effectively used in English Composition and
specifically to the writing genre that we are studying at that time. Note that
the oral presentation is worth 10% of your final grade.
Tests: All students of English 101 are expected to take the impromptu
essay examinations which are used for assessment purposes. There will also be an
midterm and final examination. If I feel it is necessary, you may also be tested
on the assigned readings.
Grading
The number letter grading scale is set as follows:
A 95-100
A- 90-94
B+ 87-89
B 84-86
B- 80-83
C+ 76-79
C 70-75
NC 69& below
Scoring Grade
Your final grade will be broken down as follows:
Class participation: 5%
Oral Presentation: 10%
Narration: Remembering an Event essay: 10%
Explaining a Concept essay: 10%
Taking a Position essay: 10%
Making an Evaluation essay: 10%
Interpreting a Story essay: 10%
Midterm In-Class essay: 10%
Final In-class essay: 10%
Impromptu essays (6) 15%
To receive a passing grade, students must hand in all five of the out of
class writing assignments: Narration, Explaining a Concept, Taking a Position,
Making an Evaluation, and Interpreting a Story.
Assessment of Written Work
I will use the Scoring Guide for the English Placement Test when I evaluate
your papers for a grade. A copy of that guide is attached. Use the following
scale to find the letter grade equivalent to the holistic numbers on your
papers:
6=A
5=B
4=C
3=C-
2=D
1=F
Scoring Guide
Superior 6 demonstrates superior writing, but may have minor flaws. An essay
in this category:
C
addresses the topic clearly and
responds effectively to all aspects of the task;
C
explores the issues thoughtfully
and in depth;
C
is coherently and logically
organized, with ideas supported by apt reasons and well-chosen examples;
C
is generally free from errors in
mechanics, usage, and sentence structure.
Strong 5 demonstrates clear competence in writing. It may have some errors,
but they are not serious to distract or confuse the reader. An essay in this
category:
C
clearly addresses the topic,
but may respond to some aspects of the task more effectively than others;
C
shows some depth and
complexity of thought;
C
is well organized and
developed with appropriate reasons and examples;
C
displays some syntactic
variety and facility in the use of language;
C
may have a few errors in
mechanics, usage, and sentence structure.
Adequate 4 demonstrates adequate writing. It may have some errors that
distract the reader, but they do not significantly obscure meaning. An essay
in this category:
C
addresses the topic, but may
slight some aspects of the task;
C
may treat the topic
simplistically or repetitively;
C
is adequately organized and
developed, generally supporting ideas with reasons and examples;
C
demonstrates adequate facility
with syntax and language;
C
may have some errors, but
generally demonstrates control of mechanics, usage, and sentence structure.
Marginal 3 demonstrates developing competence, but is flawed in some
significant way(s). An essay in this category reveals one or more
of the following weaknesses:
C
distorts or neglects aspects
of the task;
C
lacks focus, or demonstrates
confused or simplistic thinking;
C
is poorly organized or
developed;
C
does not provide adequate or
appropriate details to support generalizations, or provides details without
generalizations;
C
has problems with or avoids
syntactic variety;
C
has an accumulation of errors
in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure.
Inadequate 2 is seriously flawed. An essay in this category reveals one or
more of the following weaknesses:
C
indicates confusion about the
topic or neglects important aspects of the task;
C
lacks focus and coherence, or
often fails to communicate its ideas;
C
has very weak organization,
too little development;
C
provides simplistic
generalizations without support;
C
has inadequate sentence
control and a limited vocabulary;
C
is marred by numerous errors
in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure.
Incompetent 1 demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in writing skills. An
essay in this category reveals one or more of the following weaknesses:
C
suggests an inability to
comprehend the question or to respond meaningfully to the topic;
C
is unfocused, illogical,
incoherent, or disorganized;
C
is undeveloped;
C
provides little or no relevant
support;
C
has serious and persistent
errors in word choice, mechanics, usage, and sentence structure.
Late Work
Assignments submitted after the due date will not be accepted. In other
words, you will receive no points at all for that essay. I will only allow you
to make up missed work if you have a written documented excuse from someone
stating the urgency of the situation (e.g. Doctor’s note, CHP accident
report, etc.).
Attendance
Your attendance is required at
all class meetings. Only written documented excuses for an absence may result in
your making up an assignment or graded daily work. Absences endanger your grade
simply because of the amount of writing done in class. Three absences will
result in an overall reduction of one full letter grade and five absences will
result in a failing grade for this class.
Tutorials
You are encouraged to visit the writing center located in UH 387. Many
knowledgeable, interested and friendly tutors in the center are ready to help
you according to your needs. One bonus point will be awarded to each visit to
the writing center and a maximum of 5 points may be earned to account for the
05% participation in your final grade. You must bring signed slips from the
tutors in order to get the credit.
The Response Journal
Though the response journal is not an assignment that you have to submit
for a grade, it is a very important part of the course. It records your progress
as you learn about English and the composing process. There are two kinds of
responses to this process. You should have your response journal beside you as
you do your homework and your assigned readings and you need to make regular
weekly entries in it. Its purpose is to assist you in becoming an active
rather than a passive learner of composition. Furthermore, the response journal
will help prepare you for the impromptu essay tests.
Reserve either a separate notebook or a section of a loose leaf notebook for
the response journal for this course. Draw a vertical line down the middle of
each page. The right-hand side of the page is for your summaries of each
assigned chapter in The St. Martin’s Guide to Writing and Free
Falling and Other Student Essays. The left-hand side is for your response to
what you have read (1) as you read and (2) later on after you have had time to
reflect and add context. The journal is not the place for class notes, or for
work from other courses; it is specifically for the reading and homework
assignments for English 101. Note also that a journal is not designed as
finished, presentation writing, and hence need not be edited for form.
There are two stages for each journal entry, so be sure to date all entries.
The first stage occurs when your read the assigned reading: the summary appears
to the right, and questions, puzzles, connections, and the like appear to the
left. The second stage occurs when you review the journal. You will now engage
in a renewed dialogue both with the material and with your earlier comments.
Oral Presentations
During the quarter, each student will have an opportunity to give an oral
summary in one of the following areas: critical thinking, writing strategies,
research strategies, or writing for assessment. This is a 5-10 minute oral
assignment that requires you to think about your learning. You will be assigned
a specific number of pages to read. Then you will summarize and respond to the
reading by preparing an oral summary about how you might be able to use the
information to improve your writing skills. If the topic relates to a past,
current, or future writing assignment for English 101 or for another university
class, you may discuss those connections. The oral presentation will give you an
opportunity to share with your classmates your knowledge about the composing
process. The oral presentation will be graded according to the following simple
set of criteria. Grades will not be affected by the nature of your response; you
should feel completely free to say anything you wish, as long as you say
something related to your assigned readings. Please try not to speak any longer
than ten minutes.
Grade of A: The oral summary shows attentive summaries of the reading
assignment and shows real, thoughtful responses/discussions. The oral
summary includes specific experiences with how critical thinking, writing ,
research or writing for assessment strategies can be used or are being used
in English 101 or other university classes. The oral summary is
approximately five to ten minutes long.
Grade of B: The oral summary shows skimpy readings and summaries, along
with some responses/discussions. The oral summary includes some personal
application of the critical thinking, writing, research or writing for
assessment strategies but it isn't specific as to how they can be used or
are being used in English 101 or other university classes.
Grade of C: The oral summary is mostly summary with little if any
response to the readings. Has little if any personal application of how the
critical thinking, writing, research or writing for assessment strategies
can be used or are being used in English 101 or other university classes.
The oral summary is unplanned, unrehearsed, and disorganized.
Grade of NC: Shows no evidence of the readings. The oral summary is so
disorganized that it is difficult if not impossible to understand how the
critical thinking, writing, research or writing for assessment strategies
can be used or are being used in English 101 or other university classes.
This is the criteria that I will use to evaluate your oral
presentation for this class.
Oral Skills Evaluation Form
Student
__________________
Date_____________Points___________________
I will analyze and evaluate the following aspects of the
presentation. The scoring scale is as follows: 4=Excellent, 3=Good,
2=Fair, 1=Poor, 0=Very poor
Delivery
Volume-Did the student speak loud enough?
0 1 2 3 4
Gestures-Did the student use his/her hands?
0 1 2 3 4
Eye Contact-Did student often make eye contact with
audience? 0 1 2 3 4
Pronunciation-Could you understand what the student was
saying? Did the student’s pronunciation interfere with you
understanding his/her oral presentation? 0 1 2 3 4
Intonation-Did the student use higher pitches as well as
stress on the words that carry information in the presentation? In
other words, did the student vary or change his/her intonation? 0 1
2 3 4
Fluency-Was the student fairly fluent with the
presentation? In other words, did the student stumble and stutter as
if to be trying to find the right word to say or did it seem that
the student had practiced the presentation several times before? Was
the student comfortable giving the presentation? 0 1 2 3 4
Organization
Introduction-Did it have a lively introduction? Was there a
thesis statement of some kind that let you know what the
presentation was going to be about? 0 1 2 3 4
Body-Did the body develop the thesis statement in the
introduction? Was the presentation thorough and clear? Did it
develop the thesis statement enough so that the presentation had
full development and detail? In other words, were there supporting
details and background information in the body? Were there smooth
transitions between each supporting detail or was the body choppy
and awkward? 0 1 2 3 4
Conclusion-Did the conclusion relate to the introduction
and the body? Did it end abruptly, or was it a well thought out and
planned conclusion. Did the student tell you in short was he/she
just said? 0 1 2 3 4
Language
Vocabulary-Did the student have a good command of the English
language?
0 1 2 3 4
Grammar-Did the student show competent use of grammar,
sentence structure, transitions, subject-verb agreement, etc. 0 1 2
3 4
What aspect of this presentation was least effective?
What was the greatest strength of this presentation?
English 101
Fall Quarter
Course Syllabus
(This schedule may be subject to change throughout the
quarter).
Chapter 2/Remembering Event
Sept. 23 First Day of Class: Explanation of course
requirements/Chapter 1 introduction
28 Group Activity p. 21
Handed My Own Life pp. 22-23 by Ann Dilliard
;
On Being a Real Westerner
pp. 26-28 by Tobias Wolff;
Features of Essays about Remembered events pp. 40-41;
Taking essay examinations; Read "Who Are We" pp. 1-18
30
NImpromptu
diagnostic essay #1; NInvention
Writing Workshop pp. 42-46;
NPlanning
and drafting paper pp. 46-49;Calling Home pp. 35-37 by Brandt
Oct. 5 Oral Presentations on the following topics: A catalog
of invention strategies (429-440 ), reading strategies (441-
464),and cueing the reader (465-480); Scoring sample essays pp.
49-54; Read "Who Are We" pp. 19-43
Chapter 5/Explaining Concepts
7 Middle Draft Peer Review of Event paper due
(Bring four copies); Group Inquiry p. 158;Love the Right Way pp. 159-161
12 Final Draft Event Paper due
;
Basic features of Explanatory essays pp. 180- 181 Schizophrenia pp.
173-176; NImpromptu
essay #2
14
NInvention
writing workshop 182-186;NPlanning
and drafting paper pp. 186-187;
Past Independence: Why the Best Doesn't Always Win pp.
170- 171; Contingent Workers pp. 164-166; NImpromptu
essay #3; Read "Who Are We" pp. 44-59
19 Oral Presentations on the following
topics: narrating (481-490),describing (491-502), and defining
(503-512); Scoring sample essays pp.188-193
Chapter 6/Taking a Position
21
NMidterm
In-Class Essay; Middle Draft Peer Review of Concept
paper due (Bring four copies); In Defense of Talk
Shows pp. 210-211
26 Final DraftConcept paper
due; Group inquiry p. 203; Basic Features of Position papers
pp. 223-224; Sticks and Stones and Sports Team Names pp.
204-206;
Scoring sample
essays pp. 234-240;Read "Who Are
We" pp. 60-76
28
NInvention
writing workshop pp. 225-231;
NPlanning
and drafting pp. 231-233;
The Declining Art of Political debate pp.
214- 216 by Etziorti; NImpromptu
essay #4
Nov. 2 Middle Draft Peer Review of
Taking a Position paper due (Bring
four copies); Children Need To Play, Not Compete pp.
218-221 by Statsky; Group inquiry p. 293
Chapter 8/Making Evaluations
4 Final Draft of Taking a Position paper
due
; Black Eye pp. 294-296; Basic features of
Evaluations pp. 315-316; "Children Need To Play, Not
Compete" By Jessica Statsky: "Children Need To Play, Not
Compete" By Jessica Statsky: An Evaluation pp. 309-312
9
NInvention
Writing Workshop 317-322;
NImpromptu
essay #5; Read "Who Are
We" pp. 77-95
11
NPlanning
and drafting pp. 322-324; Oral Presentations on the following topics:
classifying(513-519),comparing and contrasting (520-525), and
arguing (526-543); Scoring sample essays pp. 325-331
16
Middle
Draft Peer Review of
Making an
Chapter 10 /Interpreting Stories
18 Final Draft of Making an Evaluation paper
due
; Basic features of Interpreting Stories pp.
406-407; Gazing into the Darkness pp. 398-400;
Invention
writing workshop 408-415 (Choosing and annotating the story) From
Innocence to Insight. "Araby" As An Initiation Story pp. 403-405; Read "Who Are We" pp. 96-115
23
NPlanning
and drafting 415-416; NImpromptu
essay #6; Oral presentations on the following topics: field
research (544-555),library and Internetresearch(556-594),
using and acknowledging sources (595-629), and essay
examinations (630-647); Read "Who Are We" pp. 115-132
25 Thanksgiving Class Holiday: no class
Dec. 2 Scoring sample essays pp. 417-422; Middle
Draft Peer Review of Interpreting a Story paper
(Bring four copies) Last Day of Fall Regular Classes; Read
"Who Are We" pp. 133-150
9 Final Draft of Interpreting a
Story paper due
;
NIn-class
final @ 6:00 p.m.; Read "Who Are We" pp. 151-170